Sign in to follow this  
Broken_Mirror33

Oneness is Not the Ultimate Truth of the Universe: An Exercise in Non-affirming Negation

Recommended Posts

Oneness is Not the Ultimate Truth of the Universe: An Exercise in Non-affirming Negation

After reading several posts on this forum in reference to this video and commenting on this video myself, I can't help but feel this topic is deeply misunderstood.

It's actually quite simple to understand the topic being discussed. However, one must first understand the concept of non-affirming negation. A non-affirming negation is the negation of an object without leaving another object in place of the one being negated.

In this example, Oneness is the object being negated without projecting another idea or concept in its place. So, how do you negate Oneness without projecting the idea of Source, God, or the Universe in its place? (Watch the video and find out.)

Realize, however, that following along with the video in itself is an exercise in non-affirming negation. Can you catch Teal's description of Oneness at the metalevel? How about at the meta-meta-level (hint: there are two)? (Comment below.)

Edited by Broken_Mirror33
grammar and style
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this